Buffalo-demon Mahisha (14TH-15TH centuries
Fig.2. Young warrior (early 16th century)
Fig 1 is the artwork from the part
of southeast part of Asia, Nepal, in between 14th and 15th
centuries. The goddess in the picture is
the Hindu goddess durga with 18 arms. She is considered the goddess of power and
she demonstrates the victory of good over bad. She slays the demon that
appeared in front of her as the buffalo.
Fig 2 is the European artwork from
the early 16th century. It is the sculpture of the young warrior and
the full length of this picture is supposed to show the spear in the hand so as
to represent the nature of the warrior.
Both the picture clearly
illustrates the difference in the artwork of Southeast Asia and Europe around
the same time when the material used is concerned. However, both the shows some
similarity as these represent the power. Fig 1 is the goddess that has the
almighty power on the other hand fig 2 is the warrior who fought the battle, symbolize
power. While Southeast Asia designed the
sculpture using the copper, Europe fascinated the art history with its uses of
marble. Both the artwork has been able to clearly shape the each detail of the
person it represents. The body of the warrior and his clothes details are seen
clearly. While the hands and the body parts of the goddess are easily
distinguishable.
Overall the art history during the
14th and 15th century can be considered as the developing
one. Artist during that period has so been able to give the detail information
about their artworks.
By seeing the similarities between these artworks ,we cant really tell that they know each other. Asia were using metals for their artwork in this period while Europe was using the marble.
Both the artwork deserves its place in the art history as they both holds their own importance . And they represents the art of the particular time zone.
By seeing the similarities between these artworks ,we cant really tell that they know each other. Asia were using metals for their artwork in this period while Europe was using the marble.
Both the artwork deserves its place in the art history as they both holds their own importance . And they represents the art of the particular time zone.


Good choice in artworks and comments. Yeah, there is no indication that they knew much about each other. Some trade existed but there would be clear cultural exchange until maybe the 17 or 1800's. As to the question of the audience or purpose for each respective piece, think about the use for which each statue was intended. The Nepalese piece seems to have been made for religious purposes (maybe?), and the european piece seems more secular. If you listed the size of each work it might be more clear if they were intended for public display or private ownership. I really like the thoughts about the different demonstrations of power!
ReplyDelete(A)